Sunday, January 17, 2016

Rest in Peace Alan Rickman 1946-2016

What started as a normal, thirteen in a dozen kind of day ended in shock.


Alan Rickman, long time member of my band of heroes had died that morning, news arrived in an e-mail from a friend saying "you've probably heard the news about Alan Rickman's passing. I'm heartbroken. Just wanted to touch base and share my grief".

I had not heard or read about it yet, and went online straight away in hopes of the news being false… one of those hoax articles but it soon turned out to be true… the BBC does not do hoax...

I'm shellshocked.

Not many things hit me so hard that it leads to tears, I had no personal relation with mr Rickman, I've been a long time admirer of his body of work which made him part of my personal band of heroes. Heroes are supposed to be immortal, we think they will be there for all time. It hurts to realize they are not.

Metatron (Dogma), Hans Gruber (Die Hard), Colonel Brandon (Sense and Sensibility), the Sheriff of Nottingham (Robin Hood), He (Song of Lunch), Judge Turpin (Sweeney Todd) to just name a few in the diverse roles, all filmed to revisit at will. I was lucky enough to be awed as well by his stage work. Twice I jumped on a plane and flew out to various stages in Dublin and New York just for the opportunity to see him go back to his stage roots. I'm fortunate that I can make these decisions, for members of my little band of heroes I go to great lengths to see them work on stage, and I'm very glad that I did for mr Rickman. Such a talent, Stage presence to the hilt and that voice… oh that voice.

I had hoped to get another chance, to see his Lear, his take on Beckett, Pinter, another Ibsen, or perhaps one of his own original works, but it's not to be.


I was familiar with most of his work, but I did not know much about the person, other than that he was certainly very nice to - and patient with - his fans at stage door.  In the last few days I've learned so much more about him. His friends, compatriots and coworkers took to the web and spoke beautiful words about their lost friend. They say he was funny, friendly, down to earth, the best of friends that always took the time to help, support and simply be there when they needed him. Who took an interest in their work, went to their plays, exhibits, arranged auditions. A private person, I learned he was in a relationship for 50 years with his wife, a man who was devoted, passionate, politically and socially engaged. A person anybody would be proud to call friend. The suddenness of this news made it feel unreal, and yet now, three days later I can feel some sort of consolation that until the end he could be the private person that he was. No rumors, no public displays. "Alan Rickman has died at the age of 69", it dropped like a bomb and rightly so.



I was mourning the loss of my hero, now I am also mourning the loss of the person. I feel deeply for all those that knew the real Alan Rickman, my deepest sympathies and heartfelt condoleances for his wife Rima, and his friends and family.

I hope I am the friend to my friends as he was to his, but I know I am probably not. If anything, this new knowledge of the man behind the artist I so admired, inspires me to try harder.


Epic Tea Time with Alan Rickman (Official HD Version)
Scored by: Music from Inception - Mind Heist Created by: David Michalek Description: The film of Alan Rickman is from the project, Portraits in Dramatic Time…





——————————————————————
Links to some of the public tributes
Michael Billington - Alan Rickman a master of theatre who looked back in languor

Sean Biggerstaff
Daniel Radcliffe
JK Rowling
Emma Thompson
Ian McKellen
Stanley Tucci
Richard Curtis
Neil Kinnock

Patrick StewartKate WinsletHelen MirrenEmma ThompsonIan McKellenSigourney WeaverRichard WilsonBrian CoxRuby WaxHarriet WalterStephen PoliakoffMax Stafford-ClarkZoe WannamakerCatherine BaileyJanet Suzman


Saturday, October 25, 2014

My Night with Reg, Donmar - London Sept 2014

"My Night with Reg" was a great evening out... feels weird to say this about a play that revolves for a big part about aids, but it was very funny, focussed on friendships and relationships as well as the never mentioned killing nightmare of the 80s.

Very hard to describe the plot without giving the entire thing away.

Reg is the central character that we never meet, a binding force of a circle of friends of gay men. We see 3 gatherings of friends in the flat belonging to Guy, who as far as we can tell is the complete opposite of Reg character-wise. Confidant of everybody, but somehow on the outside of the circle. The shadow of Aids hangs over all gatherings yet it is never mentioned by name. That sounds dark and gloomy, but really this play is written playful and witty, it's vibrant, full of energy and laughter yet dealing with a broad array of emotions.

The entire cast was excellent. Personally I adored Richard Cant's Bernie... billed as the most boring character but I loved him!

Kudos to the director Robert Hastie, Donmar stages it's plays with audience equally divided on 3 sides so you really need to play to them all, two guys briefly go full monty, beautiful bodies on display... it was nice to see Hastie made sure in his staging that all in the audience got the 360 view.

The play ran straight through without intermission, almost 2 hours, fully enjoyable, never boring.

Geoffrey Streatfeild (Daniel) and Jonathan Broadbent (Guy).
Photograph Johan Persson

Geoffrey Streatfeild (Daniel) and  Jullian Ovenden (John).
Photograph Johan Persson


Cast:
Jonathan Broadbent (Guy) 
Geoffrey Streatfeild (Daniel)
Julian Ovenden (John)
Lewis Reeves (Eric)
Richard Cant (Bernie)
Matt Bardock (Benny)

director: Robert Hastie
playwright: Kevin Elyot


review blurbs:

"The director Robert Hastie does the piece proud, capturing its constantly shifting moods with great elan and with the help of an outstanding cast."
Charles Spencer for Daily Telegraph
"I hope that Hastie and gang are taking pride in how this production pays the author's memory a huge and (in every respect) handsome tribute."
Paul Taylor for The Independent
"Played straight through at 110 minutes, Robert Hastie's production catches the secret fears and surface buoyancy of this group of companions and gets fine performances all round."
Michael Billington for The Guardian
"Robert Hastie’s revival triumphs through a smartly judged mixture of exuberance and delicate understatement, highlighting the cool precision of Elyot’s writing — an assured command of structure and a gift for incisive comedy."
Henry Hitchings for The Evening Standard
"A landmark production of a landmark play."
Patrick Marmion for The Daily Mail


Jonathan Broadbent (Guy) and Lewis Reeves (Eric).
Photograph Johan Persson
***

The Playwright Kevin Elyot died, aged 62, around the time this revival was going into rehearsal. It’s sad he’s not around to enjoy its success all over again.

Kevin Elyot obituary

Television scriptwriter and playwright who made his name with the smash hit tragicomedy My Night With Reg
Kevin Elyot
Kevin Elyot's attempts to 'jazz up' Agatha Christie had mixed results. But audiences loved his television adaptations
The playwright Kevin Elyot, who has died aged 62 after a long illness, is best remembered for his brilliantly written and imaginatively structured tragicomedy My Night With Reg (1994). It is often claimed as a "gay play", but although Elyot wrote often about gay relationships, his real subject was the longing for love and remembrance of loves lost.

Sunday, October 5, 2014

I'm curious - how does the selection process go as far as actors who get to choose are concerned?

how do Actors select the next play to work on... ? (when I say Actor, I mean male or female)
William Petersen in 'Dublin Carol'
at Trinity Rep (Providence RI)

I realize a majority of actors or directors do not have the luxury of really selecting their projects... but even if you are not in that position, there probably still is some level of selection in what to audition for.

Let's say you are in the position to select your next project, your time is yours and the money is of no real consideration... you made your fame and fortune in tv and movies, you did not waste your hard earned Dollars, Pounds or even Euro's on dodgy investments, the wrong fellow humans, castles, cars or drugs. You can choose to work or you can choose not to, or even retire... yet as I've been told by people who should know, acting is in your blood... an actor often keeps working, but if in this luxury position, he can do so on his own terms (must be nice, I'm jealous!).

I wonder, what makes a project interesting?

Rhys-Ifans in 'Protest Song' at The Shed
(NT) London
Is it the play itself? the challenging character available to give life to? is it the chance to work with other actors or a director already committed? or, if the project is in the early stages a chance to be involved with the selection of co-stars, director or other disciplines in the creative team?

Here's a 1981 article dealing with this same question... I imagine the situation has changed some, I think now even less plays are written with a specific actor in mind... more and more actors make their fame and fortune in tv or movies and venture (back) out to the stage, either because that is their first love, or because they have listened to their fellow actors waxing about how stage work is so different they want to experience it at least once (I haven't researched this, but I imagine that last category either falls in love or only does it once, as stage work definitely takes a different kind of dedication to the trade than tv or movie work).

a few quotes that jumped out for me (entire article included at the end of this post)


Krister Henriksson in 'Dr Glas' ,
Wyndham's Theatre, London
In the first place, say actors and producers, there just aren't that many wonderful new plays around - even for a star. And wonderful new plays suited to a particular actor's particular talents are even scarcer.

True, but I wonder if our actor who has the luxury of choice, would choose to take a risk on a new play or would choose to play that classic character he always wanted to play? The offerings of brilliant new plays might be as scarce as it was then, the library of wonderful plays that were produced before just keeps growing.

''I'm always amazed when a critic says, 'why would so-and-so pick to do this play?' '' she says.''That statement should be cut from every critic's review. It makes the assumption that actors are reading wonderful plays all the time, and that out of six, they reached out and took the wrong one. It's difficult for actors like Gerry (Page) or Julie (Harris) or G.C. (Scott) to be attacked on that level, as though they hadn't used their heads. My main reason and theirs is that we want to come back to the stage - it's what keeps you alive. ''You get to the point where you have nothing and you just want to go back to work.

Right, if you are looking for new work... on the other hand though there are a lot of wonderful plays out there that were produced before, that you can have some idea of on what might work or what not... Not that that is a guarantee for a perfect hand in picking a play... so many other things factor in, set design, sound, direction... for some plays even the sign of the time might work for or against it.

Fiona Shaw, Alan Rickman and Lindsay Duncan
in 'John Gabriel Borkman' at The Abbey Theatre in Dublin

To me the most important thing for our actor should be if he thinks he will have a good time working on the project, would the character push his buttons? make him flex his acting muscles, make him want to pull out all the stops to do it justice? does the story speak to him? of course our actor still would want the play to be a succes, draw in the audience because after all a lot of people make their living off the theater that will put up this play. But he is lucky enough to be able to wait until the right balance comes along.

William Petersen in 'Blackbird' (Victory Gardens Theater, Chicago)
There used to be a following of theater people who went to see great actors - certainly all the plays the Lunts were in were not of equal caliber. But in this town today, there are no actors with followings. If the play doesn't work, it doesn't matter who's in it.

there still is a following!

Daniel Radcliffe in 'Equus'
NOT Harry Potter
admittedly there are not enough to fill a theater no matter what. I see a few fellow followers at some plays, we go for certain actors, directors, playwrights or specific plays.

I think these days 'the followers' can be roughly divided into 2 categories, 1) the single focussed ones who are a fan of a Celebrity in another trade and follow him or her to the the theater - case in point, the Daniel Radcliffe/Harry Potter fans who flocked to "Equus" who may have left the theater in shock for not having seen Harry Potter but DR in a very different role... or the William Petersen/Grissom fans who overran the town of Providence RI when he took a break from the (then) hugely successful CSI to do a play.
William Petersen in 'Dublin Carol'
at Trinity Rep, Providence RI
NOT Grissom

Where DR took to West End and Broadway, where the celeb fans were easily absorbed, WP found a small theater in a small town where all the celeb fans pretty much stood out.

.
And 2) there is the category of followers who fell in love with the theater at some point in their lives and will go to any play if it has certain cast members in it - usually following a number of actors who have proven themselves to have captivating stage presence, but will also go to great lengths to see plays by a certain playwright or director or sometimes even a venue or a production company (the Michael Grandage Company comes to mind), who keep an eye out on Fringe Festivals to see the new gems before they get discovered by the rest of the world... yes, we are not a club of millions, but we are here!

For the theater community, I'd say both categories are good, it would be a bonus if the Celeb fans who may find themselves in a theater for the first time following their celeb, like it enough to come back for other plays. I remember Timothy Dalton once saying during the press run for his first James Bond movie where he got criticized for doing a Bond movie while he was a 'serious' stage actor, 'wasn't he afraid now that people would come to the theater to see James Bond and not whatever Shakespeare character he was playing at the time?' his reply: of course it was a different thing to do, but if going to see his movie made a few of those people go to the theater, even if it was to see James Bond he would be happy... those people would NOT get to see James Bond (like many CSI fans were aiming to see Grissom at Triniy Rep in Providence RI), but they might see something they liked and come back for more...if not, at least a few more tickets were sold for that play, if they came back, more tickets! win win.

Judi Dench in 'Peter and Alice'
Michael Grandage Company, London
Celebs will draw people to the theater, I'm undecided on the whole issue of stunt casting, but at least it gets people to the theater... and more people, means more money and more money in theater world means more chances for other productions, for other actors and other playwrights.

The 2nd categorie of followers are not so many that they make much of a difference as far as 'butts in seats' are concerned, but they are more vocal about their passion... they take to social media, blogs and in that small way contribute to the theater buzz.

Clearly most actors in these days of movies and television do not appear in the theater for money. Instead, many stars including Colleen Dewhurst, Ruth Gordon, Jason Robards, Laurence Olivier, John Gielgud, and Geraldine Page have used Hollywood as a means of financing their stage careers. By making the occasional picture - often a picture chosen with an eye toward making substantial money - they can be more selective when it comes to choosing shows.
very true, and I am grateful that this is happening...  keep funding the theater opportunities Hollywood!

There are a few directors such as Harold Prince and Mike Nichols whose reputation alone is enough to win over a reluctant actor. ''Actors will frequently go with Hal on faith,'' says Mr. Prince's casting director Joanna Merlin. ''Sometimes we won't have a final draft and the score's not completed, but they're willing to take a chance because they know his work.''
What's more often the case is that an actor develops a special working relationship with a particular director or producer, and feelings of loyalty and trust persist.

My money is on the joy in collaboration being #1 consideration for our actor, with the Character on offer a close second. I'm thinking not even collaborating with friends or heroes will make up for a character that is a wrong fit. Of course the message of a play can also be so powerful our actor would want to work on it no matter the rest of the cast or creative team. It seems to be rare though to make a choice solely on the message of the play.

to illustrate, from a recent interview (2014)
(Bill Nighy, Carey Mulligan, Matthew Beard: interview The stars of David Hare's Skylight in the West End talk to Sarah Crompton about theatre, ideals - and cooking on stage)
SaraCrompton: So what’s the bit that pulls you back? 
BillNighy: I don’t know, I’ve been trying to work it out. [He half-laughs] It’s more than usually possible that I won’t do a play again. But Skylight is one of the great plays in the English language. I was lucky enough to be a part of it at one point in its life, and it’s a timely thing to deliver it again in the modern world. We haven’t attempted to contemporise it or anything. It’s set firmly when it was written, in the Nineties, and to see how it resonates now is quite extraordinary. 
When you are in something that you’re proud of and it’s funny and it’s a good night out and all of those things, there’s nothing quite like it. The rewards are proportionate to the amount of alarm and distress it causes you.

Bill Nighy in 'Skylight' at Wyndham's Theatre, London

WHAT MAKES AN ACTOR CHOOSE A CERTAIN ROLE?

REGEN KAKUTANI By MICHIKO KAKUTANI
The theater has always been a whimsical business, and in no respect do things seem more whimsical than in casting. Why, for instance, is Richard Burton turning his back on King Lear, a role he's always wanted to play, just to tour the provinces in ''Camelot,'' a show he did 20 years ago?

Friday, October 3, 2014

Celebrity stunt casting - Lindsay Lohan's failed mission of taking away attention from being a celebrity name and draw attention to the fact that she's an actress

Casting Lindsay Lohan in Mamet's 'Speed the Plow' at London's West End I thought was a bold move... acting abilities aside if I were a producer the not-so-reliable reputation alone would make me nervous.

Lindsay Lohan as Karen and Nigel Lindsay as Charlie Fox in Speed-the-Plow.
Photograph: Tristram Kenton
That same reputation made many people expect a train wreck... even before rehearsals started rumors made it to Playbill.com saying Lohan was already "final warning" for her behavior during rehearsals for the upcoming London revival of Speed-the-Plow.

I've not seen the play, I will not see it because I'll not get to London during its run,  if I were I'd probably go see it, if not to see how this stunt casting worked out but because I was a huge fan of The West Wing - casting the accomplished Richard Schiff would have been enough reason for me to bag myself a ticket.

Because stunt casting this is...
‘I’m at a point when I want a diligent routine and I really want to get back into work. And I wanted to do something different: people have certain perceptions of me and I wanted to change them by doing something like a Mamet play,"she told Time Out London.
She went on to say: "I’m hoping it’ll take away attention from me as a celebrity name and draw attention to the fact that I’m an actress."
Really? A Mamet Play in London's West End is your idea of a good opportunity to get your toe in the water? and even more interesting, it's your attempt to draw away from being a celebrity name and going back to being an actress first?

I think the producer had a different idea and cast you because of the celebrity rep... but hey, who cares why you were cast, go for it!

First opinions were...  terrible:

Lindsay Lohan defends Speed-the-Plow West End debut after messing up lines
The Independent 

but honestly, this was after the first preview... and it's called previews for a reason. Yes I'd expect the cast to be off book even in the first preview, but they might still be tweaking, the show has not openend yet, you have no real expectation to the finished product...

Lohan going on the defense though... maybe not a great idea if the thought really was to shed celebrity and return to the basic of being an actress. Defense draws attention.

All in all what that first wave of critisism did was make me curious on the professional reviews... the critics that head to protocol and wait for opening night to watch the finished product and judge that.

To be honest I was surprised... the reviews are a bit of a mixed bag... my go-to critic is The Guardian's Michael Billington:  Speed-the-Plow review - Lindsay Lohan brings unusual naivety to tame revival... sure, he only gives it 2 stars (aka it's a bomb imo) but Lohan gets off pretty good, it's Schiff that amazingly apparently fell flat.

Lindsay Lohan (Karen) and Richard Schiff (Bobby Gould) in Speed-The-Plow. Photograph: Tristram Kenton

the Independent's headline:  Speed-the-Plow, theatre review: What a turn up! Lindsay Lohan silences the doubters with a deft performance

Paul Taylor gave it three stars, but ended his review with
A good but by no means a great night out whose value does not depend on the swirl of publicity occasioned by the female lead.
his headline is really all the positive he has to say about Lohan, both Schiff and Nigel Lindsay did work out well for him:
Richard Schiff and Nigel Lindsay are in fine, darkly frisky form as the pair of producers whose longstanding friendship she threatens to sunder.
Lindsay Lohan with Richard Schiff in rehearsal for 'Speed-the-Plow'
I would have liked to have seen this, to form my own opinion, but going by the peoples reactions to the previews and after reading the mixed bag of professional reviews, I think it's not a huge miss... I'll survive I think.

Kudos for the producers to take a chance, I hope it works well for them and their celebrity name doesn't fall back but sticks to her intention to leave her more troubled past behind at least for the entire planned run. Kudos to Lindsay Lohan for trying something new, stage work takes more bravery than movies or tv I think. The decision to do a play may have been easier than actually going out there and do it.  Great, good or bad, I'll never know for myself, but according to the critics... not too bad to say the least.

Monday, August 4, 2014

The Old Vic and Kevin Spacey

I think it was about 3 years ago that I read somewhere that the Artistic Director of The Old Vic in London was Kevin Spacey, had been for years at that point. I took it for the news fact that it was at that moment. After seeing mr Spacey in a production at the Old Vic this season - first time I've seen the man on stage - I decided to do some digging on how such a busy and successful USA movie/tv actor came to be Artistic Director of a London theatre, and how he fared.


From my limited amount of digging, it was not an easy ride... all the more reason to applaud this man for sticking with it, he's still AD but will step down next year (2015) after a tenure of 12 years. That in itself is a remarkable feat in my opinion, this is a man that has a busy career in movie and tv making, yet commits himself for 12 years to a theater that was on the brink of getting lost, it takes time and effort to pull things back together, being the famous face of the theater, be available for fundraising efforts, putting together the Theatre's season, wooing the talent.

Of course he didn't have to do it all alone, every theatre has a creative and administrative team, and running a theatre is definitely teamwork, but that doesn't take away anything from the dedication this man must have for the theatre, for the stage and for the people involved.

He had a rough start, came under attack of the critics since he took over the helm,  A Hollywood actor taking over as AD of a London Theatre, that can't be good after all, must keep a close eye! was likely the thought of many Arts journalists
Culminating in an early closing of 'Resurrection Blues' (2006), that got such terrible reviews that I'm sorry I didn't see it to judge for myself. Big name cast, big name director, apparently a complete disaster... time to take a few more shots at the Vic's celeb guy in charge.

 ***

a few quotes (italic) from Michael Billington's 2006 interview with mr Spacey after they closed down "Ressurection Blues" with its stellar cast and director a week early, playing to about 50% capacity: 

Kevin Spacey and Jeff Goldblum in Speed the Plow
"Spacey's questions point up the problems of living in a celebrity culture. The fact is that it is his Hollywood name and reputation that have helped rescue the Old Vic - while also guaranteeing that it is subjected to endless media scrutiny. And it is a dilemma he acknowledges. 
"I knew coming in," he says, "that we would be put under a microscope that no other theatre and no other artistic director would experience. Things also happen here that happen at every theatre in this country. But because my name can be placed in a headline, the press rake over everything since I arrived. And my only question is - are we being judged on a level playing field? But I'm not going to get into a debate with the press I can't win. I made a choice that I'm not going to play the game and get baited into an argument with people who have their own agenda and opinions. I also don't want to live my life having to answer everything people write. My answer is to look at what's going to happen on that stage at the Old Vic over the next eight years."

Of course he is not judged on a level playing field... but then again, other, relatively more anonymous AD's probably have a harder time getting an interview if they want one, will have a tougher time at fundraisers and so on, in the end I'd say being a celeb going in, mr Spacey knew what to expect from the press, and it's not as if he's had no experience at all in dealing with the press... his celeb status had an up and a down side going in.

Let's not forget The Old Vic, with it's illustrious past was no longer illustrious, no longer a production house but a booking house... to turn that around would have taken anyone time, let alone someone with a vast acting experience, with a lot of connections, but essentially a rookie AD.

"In the first year, I chose plays I thought would be entertaining, challenging and have audience appeal. You and your colleagues questioned that because you have a great emotional connection to the history of this theatre but I'm interested in its future. My mission in the first 18 months was to bring an audience back into the Old Vic." 
Spacey claims to have done that. He has had two artistic and box-office flops: Cloaca and Resurrection Blues. But Aladdin, with Ian McKellen, played to 95%, Richard II with Spacey himself to 90%, and both National Anthems and The Philadelphia Story, also starring Spacey, achieved figures of more than 80%. More than 400,000 people have come through the doors in the past 18 months. For Spacey that is sufficient justification for his policy. But, whether he likes it or not, he is also saddled with memories of the Old Vic's classic past dating back to Lilian Baylis; and, even if bland crowd-pleasers such as Philadelphia Story and National Anthems have done the business, they have failed to create the buzz of artistic excitement one associates with the Old Vic. " 

Give the man some time! any AD would have gotten a little more credit coming in, turning around a theater is not easy I imagine, making bold artistic choices is great, I for one would come and see... but  it's probably not a good idea to do that coming in, if you have 1000 seats to fill, a staff to pay, a building to keep up... that all costs money. There is something to say for bold, edgy programming, but you'd need to be lucky drawing in a loyal audience and not have a huge overhead cost so you don't go down on a miss fired season. I don't know the financial position of the Old Vic obviously, but they are not a small theater, they need revenue coming in just to keep paying the bills and then some to try and build a bit of a buffer to create opportunity for more risky programming.
"Spacey also has to acknowledge that it's his name that gets people into the theatre. He points out that he has spent 41 weeks on stage so far, that he is about to take Richard II to a German theatre festival in May and that he will be back in the autumn in O'Neill's A Moon For The Misbegotten. "But," he says, "because I'm often accused in the press of being arrogant, incredibly vain, of having no humility whatsoever, I chose not to be in the first production. I also didn't come here to start a theatre company that was going to be all about me. I might be at the centre of the wheel but, believe me, it's a big wheel and there are a lot of spokes. If, after 10 years, I hand over a theatre that's been successful because I've been in all the plays, then I will have failed."

The dilemma of the celeb AD... again, I applaud the man for taking it on... and now, 8 years later I think he's proven his point.

Kevin Spacey in Sam Mendes' production of Richard III at the Old Vic
***

How it Came to Be... Mr Spacey's own words

from KevinSpacey.com
The Old Vic theatre has always retained a strong grip on my imagination – I remember visiting this great Victorian stage when I first came to London as a young child, and coming back years later to see many of the theatre’s iconic productions. I finally had the chance to tread the boards of the stage myself when we transferred Howard Davis’s production of Eugene O’Neill’s “The Iceman Cometh” from its initial run at the Almeida Theatre to the Old Vic.

During our 16 week run at the Old Vic in the spring/summer of 1998, I was asked if I would join a committee to help the new Trust Board. The Old Vic had recently been purchased by a Trust and needed the committee’s help to find an Artistic Director to take on the re-vitalization of this famous and admired theatre.

This was a task I took very seriously, as The Old Vic is one of the best known and best loved theatres in the world, synonymous with the greatest acting talent that Britain has ever produced; from Laurence Olivier, Peggy Ashcroft, John Gielgud and Ralph Richardson to Judi Dench, Maggie Smith, Albert Finney, and Peter O'Toole. This iconic 195 year old building has a rich history and has always been know for the great performances that have graced its stage. 
I spent the following year learning all I could about the more recent history of this iconic building. I discovered that after the National Theatre departed the building – after 14 seasons of work under the Artistic Directorship of Laurence Olivier – the theatre became a booking house. This meant that it no longer held a company, and didn’t receive subsidies from the government which in turn lead to a decline in attendance as it ceased to be a destination theatre. There were a number of occasions when a few remarkable directors began their own companies in the building (most notably perhaps Jonathan Miller and Peter Hall), but neither of these companies managed to overcome the difficult challenges the funding presented in order to continue working there. 
In 1999 while I was in London for the premiere of American Beauty, I requested that an evening be organized for a free-flowing discussion about the future of the Old Vic. Gathered in the main rehearsal space at the top of the Old Vic were playwrights, directors, actors, theatre personnel and friends of the Vic. The questions discussed revolved around the status of the theatre: when had the Old Vic been at its best? What made it work when it was a major venue in London? What happened to it? What is its future? I left this evening with my mind swirling, and decided to take a walk rather than go to bed. 
These discussions and ideas came at a time in my life when I was reflecting on my career and I was feeling that I’d arrived at a cross-roads. Having started my professional life in the living theatre I had spent the previous 12 years focused on building a film career. I was, however, beginning to have a sense that I did not want to spend the next ten years continuing down this same path. 
Typically for London it was drizzling this night, and I ended up hailing a taxi which drove me to the National Theatre. I walked to the edge of the Thames and looked up at the grand structure reflecting on what this theatre means today and where Olivier was in his career when he decided to take on the challenge of creating a National Theatre. I then walked the six blocks to the Old Vic and sat across the street in the Emma Cons Garden looking up at the theatre. Sitting there, my swirling mind seemed to settle and I realized that all my musings were leading me to the same idea – to a secret dream I had been nurturing since I was a teenager: I should take on the Artistic Directorship of the Old Vic myself! 
Even though I was only announced as Artistic Director a few years later, after that night I immediately began working on an economic model that I believed could work without having to take subsidies, as well as starting to raise the money. I also began to find people who would join me in this major enterprise. First on board was producer David Liddiment whom I convinced to leave his post as the head of ITV. It is now eleven years later and we have a staff of over 75, both behind the scenes and front-of-house, and are working on about 49 main stage productions.

An important part of re-vitalizing the theatre was to introduce a ticket scheme to bring theatre to a wider, younger and more diverse audience. As the Old Vic doesn’t rely on subsidies and ticket sales alone are not enough to cover all of our costs, the financial support of generous individuals, companies, trusts and foundations have been vital to our existence.

The Old Vic also hosts a vast educational department which is involved in community work and runs programs in schools. In addition to this we also host a program in which we nurture emerging actors, producers, writers and directors called Old Vic New Voices.
I am now in my last 18 months as Artistic Director and am excited about the legacy I will be leaving for the next person to step into this role. I have always believed that the best asset the Old Vic has is its future and it has been my honor to dedicate myself to the theatre’s revival and to ensure its continued existence without losing sight of its illustrious past.

***

His Plays at the Old Vic during this tenure:

2014 Clarence Darrow 4 out of 5
2011 Richard III 4 out of 5
2009 Inherit the Wind 4 out of 5
2008 Speed the Plow 4 out of 5
2006 A Moon before the Misbegotten 4 out of 5
2005 National Anthems 3 out of 5
2005 Richard II 3 out of 5
2005 The Philadelphia Story 3 out of 5

Desk job ... Kevin Spacey in the Old Vic's production of Richard lll. Photograph: Tristram Kenton

all Guardian reviews:

Saturday, August 2, 2014

Clarence Darrow - Old Vic AD Kevin Spacey takes to the stage, London, june 2014



Kevin Spacey... I've loved him since he was Roger 'Verbal' Kint in The Usual Suspects... at some point I heard he was the artistic director of The Old Vic (I've learned since that he was appointed in 2003, the first artistic director since The Old Vic went back to being a producing house) he's stepping down in 2015, he'll have been the Artistic Director of The Old Vic for 12 years then... I am in awe, truly in awe that an actor of his caliber and with his schedule took the time and put in the work to be an Artistic Director for so long, and to take The Old Vic by the hand and turn it back around to the wonderful Producing house it is now.

I'd not been to The Old Vic until this year, a few weeks before Clarence Darrow I happened to be there to see Other Desert Cities, a play I'd seen in 2011 on it's premiere run in New York. I wanted to see it again in The Old Vic because it has such a different stage setting and it was simply such a great play, another take on it, casting and direction wise was just too good an opportunity to miss.

But I digress, theater geek that I am, I'm keeping  tabs on a few websites to see programming news, casting news and so on... so a while back I heard about this season for The Old Vic, to include Other Desert Cities (already enough to catch my interest) but also announcing a limited run of a one man play for Kevin Spacey, artistic directer and hot on the trail of his huge Netflix tv hit House of Cards. All in all an irresistible opportunity!

Limited run, hot tv show, big name actor, a combination spelling out HARD TO GET tickets!... so I joined the theaters 'Friend' program to get access to Priority Booking, yes this is the geek that I am (in my defense I do support a few other theaters as well in all kinds of versions of 'friend' programs, but The Old Vic had not been on my radar really until this year, while being an opportunist 'friend' this year I may continue the program just to support their dedication).

More importantly, it worked, I got a ticket, excellent seat, for my preferred day, making it a perfect combination with that other play I HAD to see and had an overlapping run (Skylight) and could make the very practical combination with a business trip. Yes, with some help from a 'friends' program all stars aligned for this one... (and yes, it sold out FAST)

so... Clarence Darrow... I'd never heard of the play, I admit my sole attraction at first was Kevin Spacey and the fact that it was a two-act one-man show... seemed like a difficult feat to pull off for anyone. But Pull It Off he did... and then some!

I decided not to read too much about the play before seeing it, letting myself be surprised, all I knew really was that it was about a lawyer.


The Old Vic has a in-the-round stage setting (they can change it if they want, but Clarence Darrow had the in-the-round)... meaning they have a pretty small stage, with audience all around the stage, so the director has to direct the play to all sides of the stage and the actor has to play to all sides obviously, there is absolutely nowhere to hide... well in this case there was, as the play opened with Clarence Darrow lying under his desk, I guess the only place to hide for the actor, and then only in the first minute or so of the play.

This play is written beautifully, it's a bit of a history lesson of Social/Civil Liberties lawyering late 1800's/early 1900's. Many pivotal trials pass the stage... all witnessed through the flashback-memories of mr Darrow.
I loved the set, just a messy office, with some parts doubling up as other spaces like a court room, the jury box, his private living room... all set and directed beautifully so that we (the audience) are never confused of where we are (remember The Old Vic in-the-round setting has a small stage, there is simply no room to create these different spaces as separate spaces as is the stage direction of the playwright), Thea Sharrock (the director) and Alan Macdonald (set designer) did an absolutely marvelous job.

Kevin Spacey was excellent, a very intense performance, it must be very hard to be in a two-act one-man play. Nowhere to hide, no co-stars to lean on or take a cue from at any time. It's all on you. Kudos to the actor, kudos to the man behind the actor for taking this on. I absolutely adored the play, and would definitely go see it again if performed anywhere else if at all possible.

The cases Darrow flashbacks to and the way Spacey brings them to life are all intense, I walked out the door grateful for this marvelous lawyer for being so dedicated to his cause (and I'm not American, his work had no real bearing for me at all). Being completely oblivious to the person Clarence Darrow before seeing this play only made it more intense, many of the cases I'd heard of one way or another before, but never knew they were all tried by the same person. The Leopold and Loeb case for instance... (yet another case I learned from by visiting theater.. saw a great production of Never the Sinner dealing with that case from Leopold and Loeb's pov in Chicago recently... directed by the always marvelous Dennis Zacek) was a revelation.

The entire audience was riveted, mr Spacey could have come back for 10 curtain calls and still have a standing ovation at nr 10... many in the audience probably were there just to see the actor live on stage, I think many of the audience were in awe of the play, of the man Clarence Darrow, and will maybe visit the theater more after this experience... win win for mr Spacey I'd say as - in my opinion -  his tenure of 12 years at The Old Vic is a testament to his dedication for the art of live theater.



***

review blurbs:

Time Out London *****
Most actors could get a round of applause with this stuff, given a modicum of conviction and a friendly crowd. But this is Kevin bloody Spacey we’re talking about, and in Thea Sharrock’s production he tackles it with such seismic energy that he might as well be a different species to the rest of us.

The Telegraph *****
Kevin Spacey's portrayal of the defence lawyer from the Scopes "Monkey" trial is a prowling, mesmerising tour-de-force, says Charles Spencer

The Guardian *****
Kevin Spacey shines in barnstorming performance
What emerges clearly in this magnificent performance is the famed American lawyer's renegade spirit

Chicago Tribune
As a portrait of an extraordinary man, this is absorbing in its detail and as pungent as if the paint were still wet. As a story of commitment to truth and humanity, it is nothing short of an inspiration.

The Express *****
KEVIN SPACEY leaves The Old Vic after 10 years with a pitch-perfect performance as the legendary American lawyer who made his name championing the underdog.

In his first acting role there since Richard III in 2011, Kevin Spacey launches into the performance with gusto and the intensity never drops

Huffington Post UK
If you are lucky enough to get a ticket, you will be rewarded with seeing one of the greats very much at the height of his powers.

The Independent *****He prowls about on splayed arthritic legs like a veteran prize fighter who refuses to be felled and splendidly squares the circle of performing a solo show in-the-round by repeatedly breaking the frame and buttonholing various sections of the audience as though they were jurors.
Darrow's claims to greatness as a battered but unbowed humanitarian find, in Spacey, the perfect advocate.

***



Why I Chose to Play Clarence Darrow in my Return to the Old Vic's Stage 

from Kevin Spacey.com:

when I was in high school. The one-man show written by David W. Rintels made its Broadway premiere at the Helen Hayes Theatre in 1974, directed by the great John Houseman and starring Henry Fonda.

It is now forty years later and I have come to the decision to tackle Rintels’ play myself. Although it is a daunting part, I have many reasons for taking it on.

The real Clarence Darrow, whom the play is based on, was a unique and courageous man at the turn of the last century. He was a lawyer who steadfastly accepted cases nobody else would take, fighting on behalf of the underdog and standing up for labor unions as well as being a staunch opponent of the death penalty during a career which spanned over 40 years. Through his dignity, intelligence and logic he often managed to convince judges and jurors to change their view, shift their prejudice and opt for a humane punishment on behalf of those he defended.

Darrow’s life has inspired several adaptations, both films and plays, and he has been portrayed by a few of my favorite actors before me, so I feel I am in good company; Henry Fonda, of course, played Darrow when the play debuted; Orson Welles played Darrow in COMPULSION, a film based on the infamous Leopold and Loeb murder trial; Spencer Tracy, with his brilliant performance in Stanley Kramer’s classic film, INHERIT THE WIND, captured Darrow’s passion and commitment like no one else.

I have myself had the chance to explore aspects of Darrow’s life before now. In 1991, I made a television film for PBS called DARROW, directed by my current “House of Cards” colleague, John Coles. In the film I portrayed three decades of Darrow’s life, until the age of 70. We put a lot of effort into making the ageing process look as convincing as possible, so as not to detract from the narrative.

People often ask me what my favorite film to have worked on is. I usually brush these questions aside, trying not to play favorites, by replying: “I hope I haven’t made it yet.” If pressed on the point, however, I would have to say that filming DARROW, with my amazing co-star Chris Cooper, remains one of the best experiences I’ve had on a project.

I was recently given the opportunity to step into Darrow’s shoes a second time by staging Rintels’ play at The Old Vic. Directed by Trevor Nunn, our 2009 theatrical production of “Inherit the Wind” remains a seminal moment, so why have I chosen to portray him a third time? I jumped at the opportunity of tackling this character again, as I continue to find his rich, sympathetic personality and fertile mind intriguing, even though by now he is a character that I have come to know very well. I also feel the play is uplifting – an examination of the best in all of us. This is especially significant when so many of the things we observe and are confronted with in this world highlight the worst of humanity.

Getting up on my beloved Old Vic stage in our 10th anniversary season was also an important factor for me. I moved to London eleven years ago and taking on a play that I feel very close to just seems like a fitting way to mark this decade. The play’s shorter run also allows me to work around my shooting schedule for the third season of “House of Cards.”

The added challenges of never having performed a one-man show before, or ever having performed in-the-round for that matter, were very appealing to me.

And you know I love a challenge, so here I go!



Friday, August 1, 2014

Food & Drink - Soho and Chinatown

I adore asian food, in whatever city I'm in, I'll always visit Chinatown given the chance.

I've explored London's Chinatown a lot the last few trips, obviously it's a mix between tourist traps and the real thing. Some restaurants are just there to cater to unsuspecting tourists serving up food that has nothing to do with the asian kitchen apart from the name. I've been there, I've enjoyed some of that food, but there are many such places and easy to find so I'll not list them here.

Listing a few little gems that are maybe a less obvious choice, or so small or out of the way, you'll not notice they are there unless you look for them.



Jen Cafe

Jen Cafe, (on Yelp)

Jen Cafe - An order of Beijing dumplings for 5$
Chinatown, so pretty close to all West End Theaters
4-8 Newport Place
London, Chinatown, London, WC2H 7JP
Kitchen: Chinese
Price Range: £
excellent dumplings, freshly made every day.

Mon-Sun 11:00 - 23:00

Great deal, good food, local atmosphere, no tourist trap.
Will visit again.

Had an good time here, two chinese ladies making fresh dumplings in the cafe every day, you can see them work from the outside.  The place is really simple, cafetaria like surroundings, simple tables, benches, chairs.

Jen Cafe - roast duck noodle soup
quite possibly my next choice!
Walked in for lunch, service was good though the lady got a bit impatient with me for not having a clue what to order and trying to figure out the menu. No worries, I settled on the Beijing Dumplings, they were excellent.

While waiting for my dumplings two nice chinese ladies joined me at my table. I love it in these places, the best conversations happen like that, including cooking tips!





***


Tokyo Diner

Chinatown, so pretty close to all West End Theaters
2 Newport Place
London, Chinatown, WC2H 7JJ
Kitchen: Chinese
Price Range: £

Mon-Sun 12:00 - 0:00

Great deal, good food, local atmosphere, no tourist trap. Will definitely visit again.

Again, pretty simple, unpretentious restaurant, just how I like them, Prime location in Chinatown, hope they will be here for many more years! lots of locals eating here, super busy, always a good sign.

I went for the Soba Noodles, according to the menu:

"Soba noodles are thin and brown. Soba is made from buckwheat, which gives it a distinctive, nutty flavour. The taste is so good it can become an obsession: people travel all over Japan just to visit places where soba is made by hand."

I can see that, they were delicious! will definitely visit again.

***



Gelupo

Soho, so pretty close to all West End Theaters
7 Archer Street
London W1D 7AU
Kitchen: Icecream
Price Range: ££

Mon-Thu 12:00 - 22:30
Fri-Sat 12:00 - 23:30
Sun 12:00 - 22:00

icecream!

what else needs said!... well, it's a bit out of the way, you really have to look for it, and look good, before you know it you've missed it. Their ice cream is superb... good for a late night desert after a nice meal somewhere in the area... don't eat desert... walk your dinner off a little, find Gelupo and enjoy

***



Yalla Yalla

Yalla Yalla - counter with all kind of goodies
Soho, so pretty close to all West End Theaters
1 Green's Court
London W1F 0HA,
Kitchen: Beirut street food
Price Range: ££

Mon-Sun 09:00 - 23:00




Reasonable deal, good food, local atmosphere, no tourist trap, but more on the slick side than the simple cafetarian like places above. Will definitely visit again, probably will stick to lunch here, seems the easier time to get a table.

Hummus Fatoosh and home made pita
Wanted to eat here for a while, but it only has a few tables, always very busy so unless you're prepared to wait it can be hard to find a table. Finally managed it for lunch (apparently a better option to try).  Had the tasting platter  and their praised  SAWDA DJEJ (Sautéed chicken liver with garlic and pomegranate molasses) the Sawda Djej was a little disappointing, the liver was a little overcooked in my opinion, but all in all it was very good and I will try it again. Not extraordinary cheap, but definitely not passed on to the side of expensive... the place looks amazing, comfy seats.

Customers are a little more on the hipster side, certainly compared to the chinese places above... this is Soho, not Chinatown. But I don't think it's fallen to be a tourist trap just yet. It's a bit out of the way, that might be it's saving grace.



***





Noodle Bar (on Yelp)

Chinatown/Covent Garden, so pretty close to all West End Theaters

Noodle Bar - Sliced beef noodle soup


33 Cranbourne St, London WC2H 7AD,
Kitchen: Chinese
Price Range: £
tiny little thing, walk passed the touristy buffet to the back and get the hand made noodles!

Mon-Fri 10:00 - 2:00
Sat 10:00 - 5:00
Sun 10:00 - 23:00

Great deal, good food, local atmosphere, no tourist trap. Will definitely visit again.


Found this on Yelp, lovely find! this place is tiny, between Chinatown and Covent Garden. Luckily Yelp told me to not be turned off by the standard buffet at the front, but go to the back and sit to slurp noodles.

the buffet like front end is like any other take away chinese buffet in London, fried to death, overly sauced mostly sweet food... I like it at times, but I don't think it has anything to do with chinese food really.

Yelp knowledge in hand though, I got to the back, was lucky enough to get directed to a seat and went for the hand pulled noodles... YUM! 

Noodle Bar - Making hand-
pulled noodles

Noodle Bar - Order This (pic and caption from Yelp, have not tried this but will do next time!)



***


Just a few places mentioned here, I've focussed on Chinese/Japanese food my last 2 trips to London, I've visited more places than mentioned here, will probably post more about a few others in another post, if only to remind myself which places were worthy of a repeat visit.

I've definitely not explored all of Chinatowns options so not an exhaustive list by any means.... and if you've found your own hidden gems, please comment with recommendations!